A Week of Waiting for the King

Over the course of this week I have gone off script quite a bit and shared with you the Devotions of my friend Matthew J. Cochran. Today I am finishing up that series with Day 11 of his Waiting for the King series. That doesn’t mean though that he has concluded. He is still offering it on his website through his mailing list. I would encourage you all to take advantage of it. You can easily do that by clicking below:

Waiting for the King

Also you can find Matt online at http://www.matthewjcochran.com or by following him on Twitter @MatthewJCochran or Facebook by searching for The MJC Podcast. I would encourage you to do so. He is a great resource for scriptural learning and a well grounded follower of Christ


Day 11

Luke 2:7 And she gave birth to her firstborn son and wrapped him in swaddling cloths and laid him in a manger, because there was no place for them in the inn.

Why does the Bible point out that Mary gave birth to her “firstborn son”? The Bible minces no words, says nothing in vain. Everything has meaning. So why is this phrasing included in the story of Jesus’ birth? We already know from the previous chapter that Mary was to give birth to the Savior though she had never “known” a man. The Holy Spirit was to work in her to conceive the child. Knowing that, we’d know that this was her firstborn. So why mention it?

There are several reasons that this is significant wording. One is that King Herod had heard about this child who was to be born “King of the Jews”. Because he was a paranoid man (He actually killed his own sons because he considered them a threat to his throne), he had all of the firstborn sons of the Jewish people killed. Everyone that he thought could be this “king” was slaughtered. Jesus was a firstborn son, but He escaped the infanticide.

Another significant reason to mention that Jesus was the firstborn is that this is a title given to Him as the Son of God. He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation (Colossians 1:15). Now in this case, the word doesn’t actually point to birth order but rather ranking or stature, but we see a picture painted here.

Maybe not lastly, but the last we’ll look at, is the idea that God always required the firstborn animal to be offered as a sacrifice in the Old Testament. The firstborn all belonged to God (Numbers 3:13). Jesus was HIS firstborn, and He offered Him as a sacrifice once and for all. That is why it means something that Jesus was the firstborn in this verse.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s